WildflowerJS Reactive JS, No BS*

A no-build reactive JavaScript framework, rooted in the web platform.
No build step. No dependencies. No lock-in.

Latest release: v1.3.0 · see what's new
<script src="wildflower.min.js"></script> ...and start building.

Back to Basics

The code you write is 100% web standard code. HTML stays HTML. JavaScript stays JavaScript. CSS stays CSS. No JSX, no templating language, no custom syntax to learn. If you know the web platform, you already know how to use WildflowerJS.

WildflowerJS extends the web platform. It doesn't replace it.

Your Development Simplified

Because you develop with 100% web standards, every tool in your existing chain already understands the code: IDE, browser DevTools, linter, formatter, screen reader, SEO crawler. Nothing to install, no custom file types, no sourcemaps. Save the file, refresh, and your change is live.

Just be a web developer.

Batteries Included: One Mental Model

Router, SSR, stores, computed properties, two-way binding, event modifiers, data pools, and TypeScript types, all built in, all speaking the same language. Learn data-bind once and you know binding everywhere: lists, pools, stores, forms. There's no five-library stack to keep in sync.

One script tag. Everything you need.

<div data-component="counter">
  <span data-bind="count"></span>
  <button data-action="increment">
    +1
  </button>
</div>

<script>
wildflower.component('counter', {
  state: { count: 0 },
  increment() { this.count++ }
})
</script>

How It Works

data-bind connects state to the DOM.

data-action connects events to methods.

this.count++ triggers a precise DOM update.

Mutate state. The DOM updates.

Two Reactivity Modes

data-list for automatic reactivity: mutate state, DOM updates. data-pool for explicit control: plain objects, zero proxy overhead, you say what changed.

Same template syntax. Different performance profile. From interactive forms to per-frame particle systems. You choose the right tradeoff for the job.

Try it. Right-click, inspect this demo. Every dot is a real DOM element.

See full demo →

* Build Step

Zero Toolchain

Modern frameworks ask you to install a compiler, a bundler, a package manager, hundreds of fragile transitive dependencies, and a framework-specific file format, before you write a single line of your application.

WildflowerJS was built starting from a single principle: no build step, no tooling. Ever.

WildflowerJS asks you to add a script tag.

There's no CLI scaffolding step, no config files, no .vue/.jsx/.svelte source format. You don't debug through sourcemaps or wait on a build pipeline. Your project has zero dependencies.

Performance isn't a tradeoff. Build steps optimize bundle delivery, not the runtime work that follows it. WildflowerJS writes directly to the DOM, with no virtual DOM or reconciliation pass between state change and update, so it doesn't need a build step to be fast.

The framework is full-featured without the toolchain: router, SSR, stores, computed properties, transitions, pools. You don't need a toolchain to use any of it.

my-app/
  index.html
  app.js
  style.css
  wildflower.min.js

That's the entire project. No package.json.
No node_modules. No config files. Ship it.

Zero Install. Zero Attack Surface.

Every dependency you install is trust extended to a maintainer you've never met, running scripts on your dev machine and in your CI. A typical React + Vite + UI‑lib setup pulls in 300+ transitive packages before you write a feature.

Each one is a potential intrusion vector. NPM worms, OAuth chains compromising deploy platforms, postinstall hijacking: the supply chain is now where production code gets compromised, not the deploy. And signing isn't a backstop: Mini Shai‑Hulud (May 2026) compromised 170+ packages whose malicious versions carried valid SLSA Build Level 3 provenance, because the attestation came from build infrastructure the worm had already taken over.

WildflowerJS users don't have this attack surface, by construction. There is no npm install, no postinstall script, no transitive package graph. The framework is one file you copy or pin by hash.

As of v1.1, the same holds for building the framework itself. WildflowerJS bundles with a vendored rollup and terser pipeline pulled as three SHA‑512‑pinned tarballs: no npm install, no transitive packages, no postinstall scripts in the build path. The entire toolchain is three files verified by hash.

Zero dependencies is the absence of a problem the rest of the industry has not properly addressed.

A typical React/Vue project:

  npm install
  ├── hundreds of packages
  ├── from hundreds of maintainers
  ├── postinstall scripts run on install
  └── tens to hundreds of MB of transitive code

WildflowerJS:

  <script src="wildflower.min.js"></script>
  └── 1 file.
      No transitive dependencies.

Zero Compromise

WildflowerJS doesn't compromise performance for ease-of-use. Even with no build step, on the js-framework-benchmark, WildflowerJS performs at the level of frontier frameworks, level with the fastest signal-based frameworks across list creation, updates, selection, swaps, and removal. And for per-frame workloads, data pools lead every framework we tested in our Lorenz attractor simulation demo.

The charts here are the overall geomean standings and the operation breakdown from our latest full-field run, plus the sustained frame rate from our per-frame animation sweep. Click any chart to see it full size.

Delivery is fast too, because there's less to deliver. One file, no framework runtime split across chunks, no hydration pass. Lighthouse scores hold their own against compiled frameworks without a single build artifact.

Simplicity in the interface, performance in the implementation. WildflowerJS doesn't trade one for the other.

Benchmark setup for these charts: js-framework-benchmark operations 1 through 9, 15 samples per cell, all frameworks in a single run; total-duration medians, lower is better. The frame-rate chart runs each framework's fastest variant on the Lorenz attractor for 8 seconds per particle count, fullscreen on a 120 Hz panel; higher is better. Apple M5 Pro, 24 GB RAM, macOS 26.5.2, Google Chrome 150 (stable, headed).

Bar chart of geomean slowdown versus the fastest framework per operation, vanilla JS baseline 1.00: WF-pool 1.054, Vue Vapor 1.056, Solid 1.095, WF 1.120, Svelte 1.165, Vue 1.263. Lower is better.
Geomean slowdown vs fastest per operation. Lower is better.
Grouped bar chart of all nine js-framework-benchmark operations for Solid, Svelte, Vue, Vue Vapor, WF, and WF-pool, with per-operation rankings. WF-pool is fastest on most operations.
All nine operations, side by side. Stars mark the fastest.
Line chart of sustained FPS versus particle count on the Lorenz attractor for Solid, Svelte, Vue, Vue Vapor, WF, and WF-pool. WF-pool holds the highest frame rate at every count, staying above 60 FPS past 4500 particles.
Per-frame animation. Sustained FPS as particle count grows; higher is better.

Zero Lock-in

WildflowerJS works with the DOM, not instead of it. There's no virtual DOM intercepting your code and no compiler rewriting your markup. The render cycle is yours.

That means Leaflet, DataTables, Chart.js, D3, Three.js, any library that touches the DOM, just works. No wrapper packages or framework-specific escape hatches required. Drop in a script tag and use it.

Because your code is standard HTML and JavaScript, you're never locked in. Your skills transfer and your code is more portable. If you outgrow the framework, your knowledge doesn't expire.

This also means your "ecosystem" is all of the world of vanilla JS. Without compromises or hacks.

<!-- Use any library directly -->
<div data-component="map-view">
  <div id="map" style="height: 400px"></div>
</div>
wildflower.component('map-view', {
  state: { lat: 51.505, lng: -0.09 },
  init() {
    // Leaflet works as-is. No wrappers.
    this._map = L.map('map')
      .setView([this.lat, this.lng], 13);
    L.tileLayer('https://{s}.tile.osm.org'
      + '/{z}/{x}/{y}.png').addTo(this._map);
  }
})

Precise Reactivity

When you write this.count++, WildflowerJS updates the single DOM node bound to count. Nothing else is touched. There's no tree diffing or reconciliation pass to figure that out.

You get fine-grained updates and a simple mental model. Change a property, the bound element updates. That's the entire reactivity model.

Other frameworks ask you to learn signals, accessors, memos, effects, and subscription lifecycles to achieve what WildflowerJS does with a property assignment.

wildflower.component('dashboard', {
  state: {
    users: 1420,
    status: 'healthy'
  },
  computed: {
    summary() {
      return this.users + ' users, ' + this.status;
    }
  },
  refresh() {
    this.users = 1421;
    // Only the elements bound to 'users'
    // and 'summary' update. Everything
    // else on the page is untouched.
  }
})

One Reactivity Model. Everywhere.

Components, Stores, and Plugins all share the same reactive foundation. State, computed properties, and methods work identically no matter where they live. Learn it once, it works the same way in a UI component, a global store, or a framework plugin.

Other frameworks make you learn a different system for each layer. React components use hooks, but stores need Redux or Zustand, which are completely different APIs. Vue components use reactive data, but Pinia stores have their own patterns. Every layer is a new mental model.

In WildflowerJS, there's one model. A store is a component without a template. A plugin is an entity that extends the framework itself, adding directives, lifecycle hooks, and services. The same this.count++ triggers the same reactivity everywhere.

This unlocks patterns other frameworks can't express. A store can run headless physics simulations with tick(), feeding data into a component that renders it through a pool, all using the same reactive primitives, no glue code required.

// Component: reactive UI
wildflower.component('cart', {
  state: { items: [] },
  computed: {
    total() { return this.items.length; }
  }
})

// Store: global shared state
wildflower.store('user', {
  state: { name: '', role: 'guest' },
  computed: {
    isAdmin() { return this.role === 'admin'; }
  }
})

// Plugin: extends the framework
wildflower.plugin({
  name: 'notifications',
  state: { items: [], unreadCount: 0 },
  computed: {
    hasUnread() { return this.unreadCount > 0; }
  },
  add(msg) { this.items.push(msg); this.unreadCount++; }
})
// Access globally: wildflower.$notifications.add(...)

// Same state. Same computed. Same methods.

Live Server Data: Built In, Stays True

With WildflowerJS SSR, the page arrives already true. The server (your server, whatever back-end you prefer) renders your data into real HTML, so the first paint is real content, indexable and readable before a line of JavaScript runs. And because the markup is genuine HTML, hydration reads the page's state straight back out of the document. Server-rendered components end up exactly equivalent to client-rendered ones.

v1.3 brings data-query, which does for the rest of the page's life what SSR does for first load. Most frameworks hand you fetch() and leave the rest to you. There's an entire ecosystem of client data libraries that exists to fill that gap. WildflowerJS makes it a declaration instead. Name a source, point an element at it, say how fresh it should stay. Loading and error states, refresh on demand, request racing, and the whole refresh ladder (poll, conditional GET, focus, reconnect, server push) come with it. Oh, and there's no query language. Refinement is an ordinary computed property, and filtering happens client-side without a network round trip.

Together, Wildflower's SSR and data-query tell one story. The server renders the page with real data. Because hydration reads the page itself, there's no flash of empty content, no loading spinner over data the user can already see, and no hydration scripts locking up the main thread. The server's render is the actual UI. When paired with data-query, your SSR becomes the first result of a standing query. The query adopts that markup and keeps it updated from there.

And as you can see in the example, your markup is 100% HTML. From bean to cup, what you see is what you get.

<div data-component="product-board">
  <p data-show="$products.isLoading">
    Loading…
  </p>
  <p data-show="$products.error">
    Failed.
    <button data-action="retry">Retry</button>
  </p>

  <span data-bind="$products.count"></span>
  products

  <tbody data-query="products">
    <template>
      <tr>
        <td data-bind="name"></td>
        <td data-bind="stock"></td>
      </tr>
    </template>
  </tbody>
</div>
// The entire data layer:
wildflower.query('products', {
  from: '/api/products',
  key: 'id',
  refresh: ['focus', 'etag:60']
});

// Server-rendered page? Add data-ssr="true"
// and the markup the server sent becomes the
// query's first result. Live from there.

Data Pools

Every framework wraps collection items in reactive proxies, whether the item needs it or not. WildflowerJS gives you a choice: data-list for push reactivity (automatic), data-pool for pull reactivity (explicit control, zero proxy overhead).

Pools render plain objects with the same template syntax as lists. Mutate the object, call markDirty(), and only that item updates. Full CRUD, selection, bulk operations, all faster than the push-reactive path.

And because pools use pull-based rendering, they scale to simulations, games, particle systems, and data visualizations at native frame rate. Use cases that would choke a virtual DOM. No other framework has anything like this.

<div data-component="user-table">
  <tbody data-pool="users" data-key="id">
    <template>
      <tr>
        <td data-bind="name"></td>
        <td data-bind="status"
            data-bind-class="status === 'active'
              ? 'badge success'
              : 'badge inactive'"></td>
      </tr>
    </template>
  </tbody>
</div>
wildflower.component('user-table', {
  pools: { users: {} },

  init() {
    // Populate: plain objects, no proxies
    data.forEach(u => this.pools.users.add(u));
  },

  // Optional: add tick() and the same pool
  // renders every frame. Same template, same
  // data, different rendering frequency.
  // That's the only difference between a
  // display table and a particle system.
})

Built for AI-Assisted Development

Because WildflowerJS is standard HTML and JavaScript, AI code assistants already know how to write it. There's no custom syntax to hallucinate or compiler quirks to work around. The code an AI generates runs exactly as written, with no build step between generation and execution.

WildflowerJS ships an AI-optimized reference page with patterns, anti-patterns, and examples designed for code generation context windows. Our llms.txt file follows the llms.txt convention for machine-readable documentation.

And for structured app generation, our Universal App Manifest lets you describe an entire application as a JSON schema (components, state, computed properties, methods, templates) and have an AI generate the working code from the manifest, mediated through framework-specific idiom files.

You: "Build me a todo app with
WildflowerJS"

AI reads llms.txt or ai-assistant.html
     ↓
Generates standard HTML + JS
     ↓
<div data-component="todo-app">
  <input data-model="newItem">
  <button data-action="addItem">
    Add
  </button>
  <ul data-list="items">
    <template>
      <li data-bind="text"></li>
    </template>
  </ul>
</div>
     ↓
Open in your browser. It works, and you can read and understand the code.

How Binding Works

How a data-* attribute connects a DOM element to your state, stays in sync, and cleans up after itself, all without a virtual DOM.

Core Concept: A binding links a DOM element to the state it reads. When you add data-bind="username" to an element, WildflowerJS creates a small reactive effect for it: a function that reads state.username and writes the value to the element. Reading the state records a dependency edge, so when state.username changes, the framework wakes exactly that effect and updates exactly that element. Nothing else is scanned, diffed, or re-rendered.

Every reactive attribute works the same way. The attribute names what to read and how to apply it; the effect does the reading and writing; the dependency graph connects the two. The sections below cover the kinds of bindings, how one is born and cleaned up, and how to bind across entities.

Binding Types

Each reactive attribute creates an effect tuned to a particular job:

Attribute Purpose What the effect does
data-bind Display reactive data Reads a value and writes it to the element's text or value
data-action Handle events Invokes a method when the bound DOM event fires
data-show, data-render Conditional visibility (data-show) or full mount/unmount (data-render) Reads a condition and toggles visibility, or mounts/unmounts the element
data-list Array rendering Reconciles the array by identity and registers each row's bound fields on a per-list update dispatcher
data-model Two-way binding Writes state to the input and writes input changes back to state
📝 Namespace Prefix: All data-* attributes also support a data-wf-* prefix (e.g., data-wf-bind, data-wf-action). Use the wf prefix when integrating with third-party libraries that may conflict with standard data-* attributes. Both prefixes are functionally identical.

The Life of a Binding

A binding goes through three phases, and none of them involve a central registry or a cleanup timer.

1. Creation

When the framework scans the DOM (during component initialization, or after dynamic content is added), it finds elements with reactive attributes and creates the matching effect for each:

  • data-bind="username" → an effect that reads state.username and writes it to the element
  • data-action="save" → a handler that calls save() when the element is clicked
  • data-list="items" → a list reconciler that renders one row per item and registers each row's bound fields for targeted updates
  • data-show="isVisible" → an effect that reads isVisible and toggles the element's visibility
  • data-model="email" → a two-way binding between the input and state.email

On its first run, each effect reads the state it needs. Those reads record dependency edges in the graph, so the effect is now linked to exactly the values it used.

2. Active

Once created, effects respond to change through their edges:

  • Display bindings re-run when a value they read changes, and write the new value to their element
  • Actions wait for their DOM event and invoke the bound method
  • Lists reconcile by identity on array change, touching the DOM only for items that were added, removed, or moved. An in-place property change (items[3].qty = 5) routes through the list's dispatcher to exactly the bindings that read that field: for a field with a single plain binding, that is one direct write to one element, with no re-render of the row and no scan of its siblings
  • Conditionals re-evaluate when their condition's inputs change and show, hide, mount, or unmount accordingly
  • Models sync both ways: input changes write state, state changes update the input

Because each effect only depends on the values it actually read, a change to state.username wakes the username binding and nothing else.

3. Cleanup

Bindings are owned by the component or list that created them. When that owner goes away, its registrations and their edges go with it, in a single pass:

  • Component destruction: destroying a component disposes every effect it owns
  • List item removal: removing an item clears that row's registrations from the list's dispatcher; the list itself owns one dispatcher, not one effect per row
  • Dynamic content replacement: replacing an element's content disposes the bindings attached to the old content

There is no registry to scan and no periodic garbage collection. Ownership is what makes cleanup deterministic: a binding cannot outlive the element it was created for.

Update timing: the guarantee to build on is simple: by the time your await, timeout, or next event handler runs, the DOM reflects your state, and within any frame the user sees a consistent picture. Some updates apply immediately at the moment of the write and others coalesce on the microtask; which is which is an internal optimization detail that may change between releases, so don't build on intra-tick DOM timing.
Note: data-show keeps an element's effect alive when hiding; it only toggles CSS visibility, which is efficient for frequently toggled content. For content that should fully unmount and dispose its effects, use data-render instead.

Binding Across Entities

To read another entity's state from a template, use the $ universal accessor: data-bind="$entity.path". For JavaScript-level access, use subscribe with this.stores for stores, or wildflower.getComponent() for components. All three record a cross-entity dependency, so the binding updates when the source changes.

<!-- HTML: bind directly to another entity's state -->
<span data-bind="$user-session.user.name"></span>
<div data-show="$auth.isLoggedIn">Welcome!</div>
<span data-bind="$cart.itemCount"></span>
// JavaScript: use subscribe + this.stores for store access
wildflower.component('cart-badge', {
    subscribe: {
        cart: ['items']
    },

    computed: {
        itemCount() {
            return this.stores.cart.items.length
        }
    }
})

// JavaScript: use getComponent() for component access
wildflower.component('themed-panel', {
    computed: {
        themeClass() {
            const theme = wildflower.getComponent('theme-manager')
            return theme ? 'theme-' + theme.mode : 'theme-light'
        }
    }
})
✅ Automatic dependency tracking:
  • Bindings that read another entity via $entity.path, subscribe, or getComponent() register as dependents automatically
  • A change in the source updates only the bindings that read it
  • Cross-entity cycles are detected and broken rather than looping forever
  • Cleanup happens automatically when the dependent is destroyed

The one rule: always reach across entities through one of these tracking surfaces. If you capture a raw reference to another entity's state in a closure, you bypass the tracking proxy and the dependency is silently lost, so the update never fires. See Communication for the full set of cross-entity patterns.

Best Practices

✅ Do
  • Use $entity.path in HTML for cross-entity binding
  • Use subscribe + this.stores for store access in JS
  • Rely on automatic dependency tracking
  • Give list items a stable id so rows are reused, not rebuilt
  • Use data-render for content that should fully unmount
❌ Don't
  • Capture another entity's raw state in a closure (bypasses tracking)
  • Create circular dependencies between entities by design
  • Re-create whole arrays when an in-place mutation would do
  • Forget to remove non-reactive listeners you added by hand in destroy()